Around the World in Eighty Days, read as five moments
Published · Last updated
Around the World in Eighty Days ends on an accounting trick: Phileas Fogg is convinced he has lost his own wager, right up until someone checks the calendar.
Read against a five-moment grid for a writing day (capture, the session, the turn to structure, revision, output), this is the odd case on this list: one of the five moments isn't just present, it's the entire plot.
Capture
Phileas Fogg makes his wager after a dispute at his gentlemen's club, on the spot, over a disagreement about how quickly the globe could be circled. The novel doesn't dwell on where the idea came from or why he commits to it so completely.
It's a small, sudden decision, closer to the two seconds this grid usually gives to catching a scrap of an idea than to any careful weighing of consequences.
Verne's own capture is on record. He said that one day he picked up a copy of Le Siècle and saw calculations showing that the journey round the world could be made in eighty days; the story itself was written long after. A first fragment about "Fog" and clubs dates from around March 1872, and he began the first manuscript on 29 March.
The session
The middle is essentially one leg of the journey after another: train, steamer, elephant, train again, each leg with its own obstacle, at a steady, almost mechanical clip. It reads less like one continuous scene and more like a string of separate sessions, each anchored to whatever mode of transport carries the story forward next.
A second thread runs alongside the travel and keeps any single session from feeling too mechanical: Fix, a detective convinced Fogg is a bank robber fleeing under cover of the wager, trails the party across most of the route.
The novel first ran in installments in Le Temps, from 6 November to 22 December 1872. Fix enters in chapter VI, a tenth of the way in, and his single suspicion runs unresolved from Suez until he arrests Fogg on English soil, on top of the larger deadline running underneath everything.
The turn to structure
Most novels hide their shape until a pivot partway through forces it into view. This one states its shape in chapter III, four thousand words in: the wager, the deadline (Saturday 21 December, a quarter before nine p.m.), the running count of days, all declared before the journey even begins.
The private moment came before the book, by Verne's own account: the gain of a day arrived with the idea, "There was a dénouement ready found." With Édouard Cadol he wrote the plan of a play of the same name in February–March 1872, before he began the novel that March; and the ending was still being discussed once the serial had begun, Hetzel's son making suggestions for it on 8 November, two days in, with the last chapters appearing on 22 December.
Revision
The reworking is well documented. Two manuscripts survive, and the manuscript held by the BnF has been online on Gallica since 2012; thirty-eight autograph leaves at the Musée Jules Verne in Nantes served to develop the plot; Verne corrected proofs from November 1872 to January 1873, and before Hetzel's intervention Verne gave the Hong Kong stay far more weight. Fogg's own temperament is another matter: he adjusts his route constantly, but almost never his judgment, moving through the book as a man who revises his itinerary and nothing else.
Output
The ending turns on an accounting error built into the wager itself. Because Fogg has travelled constantly eastward, he has gained a day without suspecting it: the novel has no date line, and the General Grant crosses the 180th meridian on 23 November with no change of date. He believes he has lost the bet by five minutes, when in fact he arrived twenty-four hours ahead of time.
The delivery of the manuscript, so to speak, is the story. Does the count balance. Does the trip land inside the deadline it promised.
This is a novel where the usual order of the five moments barely applies, because the moment most books save for last is the one doing all the work from chapter III onward.
What's worth noticing instead is how much of the book's tension comes from treating output, in the plainest sense, delivering something on time, in the form it was promised, as a subject in its own right rather than a formality to get through once the real story is finished.
Fogg's deadline isn't wrapping paper around the plot; it is the plot. A manuscript built around a hard deadline of its own can use that same trick: let the counting be part of the story, instead of something that only happens once the last page is behind you.